Vance may have been putting it diplomatically. "Although themes drawn from the War of 1812 were deemed viable, the naming of warships after historically significant land battles has not proven to resonate well with Canadians and is not consistent with Royal Canadian Navy practice," the country's top military commander, Gen. The navy was very upset that they would start naming warships after army victories - Naval historian Marc Milner Internal documents show those names were dropped not because of political pressure, but due to objections from naval brass. In the fall of 2017, the Liberal government quietly announced that the new joint support ships would be named HMCS Protecteur and HMCS Preserver - a nod, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said at the time, to the recently-retired naval replenishment vessels that had refuelled and resupplied Canadian warships at sea for four decades.īack in 2013, the government of then-prime minister Stephen Harper announced that the new ships would be named after key battles of the 1812 to 1814 conflict between the United States and Great Britain - specifically, the Battle of Queenston Heights and the Battle of the Chateauguay, both British victories. Apparently, the question applies to naval ships as well.Ī series of internal briefing notes show the Canadian navy pushed back hard against the former Conservative government's plan to name the long-delayed, yet-to-be-delivered supply ships after War of 1812 battles. What's in a name? When Shakespeare asked, he was talking about romance and roses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |